we got the chance to speak with ravneet singh at 
prolearn about what we were trying to build. it was not a soft conversation. he asked where the product was weak, what the user would actually see, and why the work deserved to exist beside everything already competing for attention.
those were exactly the questions we needed. 
vivacity became more specific after that: animated, step-by-step explanations for difficult competitive-exam problems, built around the moment a student understands the theory but cannot see the path through a question.
good feedback does not make a project larger. it cuts the parts that are only there to make the founder feel clever.